Welcome, Guest
You have to register before you can post on our site.



Search Forums

(Advanced Search)

Forum Statistics
» Members: 15
» Latest member: Ralphcut
» Forum threads: 55
» Forum posts: 157

Full Statistics

Online Users
There are currently 9 online users.
» 0 Member(s) | 8 Guest(s)

Latest Threads
--- Election Day ---
Forum: Politics
Last Post: Doug1943
Yesterday, 09:05 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 6
All sunsettommy
Forum: Site Feedback
Last Post: Sunsettommy
10-21-2020, 04:10 AM
» Replies: 8
» Views: 426
Scientists Against Lockdo...
Forum: Politics
Last Post: Doug1943
10-20-2020, 04:24 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 47
Democrats Kneel to ....?
Forum: Politics
Last Post: Doug1943
10-17-2020, 09:15 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 55
Proposal for Immediate Ac...
Forum: Publicity
Last Post: Pappadave
10-15-2020, 10:50 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 157
Man Who Believes He's On ...
Forum: Politics
Last Post: Pappadave
10-15-2020, 10:25 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 145
World Health Organization...
Forum: Politics
Last Post: Sunsettommy
10-13-2020, 03:05 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 69
Face Masks are worthless
Forum: Science and Environment
Last Post: Sunsettommy
10-08-2020, 02:24 AM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 187
Hall of Shame
Forum: Announcements
Last Post: Sunsettommy
10-08-2020, 12:50 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 118
Why I am Catholic
Forum: Religion and Culture
Last Post: Donnason
10-07-2020, 08:26 PM
» Replies: 8
» Views: 547

  --- Election Day ---
Posted by: Doug1943 - Yesterday, 09:05 AM - Forum: Politics - No Replies

The number one priority for every patriot from now until 4 November (yes, including election day) must be to get as many as possible of your fellow patriots out to vote.

The kind of people who post on forums like this are likely to be 100% voters -- perhaps with the exception of those misguided souls who will help the Left get power, because there are no candidates who are 100% pure and so will not vote.

But the reality is, there are millions -- literally millions -- of good patriots, who do not vote. They may be registered, but ... they do not vote in every election.  You may know someone, or more than one, like this -- without knowing it.

How can you make sure they vote?

Here's one idea: have an "Election Day Party"  (include those who have already voted by mail, or say they have).  The idea is that everyone assembles at someone's house for breakfast, and then they all go together as a group to vote. 

A variant is that everyone assembles at one person's house, they vote, and then they come back for a meal -- which could be lunch or dinner. 

This turns what some people may see a tiresome chore, into a pleasant social event. It also reassures older voters who may be worried about violence or other chaos at the polls.

It's probably a good idea to co ordinate with your local Republican Party when doing this. They may have lists of local people who are patriots, whom you don't know.

Also: alert everyone to this trick, which apparently some people on the Left are carrying out: a young woman rings you up -- 'you' being an older person who is less likely to be internet-savvy, ie suspicious -- and tells you she is calling from the official state electoral commission which has decided that, due to the necessity to enforce 'social distancing' and avoid crowds at the polling booth, and the possibility of scuffles, it has been decided that Democrats will vote on 3 November, and Republicans on 4 November.

You are probably thinking, "No one could be so dumb as to fall for that one" but the reality is that there are many elderly people who DO fall for similar scams -- thousands of people in Nigeria and India make a good living because of this.

Remember: millions of patriots, on Election Day, will think ... "My vote can't make a difference ... Trump is gong to win/lose anyway ... the weather is not good .... I'm busy with other things ... I may have to wait for hours ... there may be violence at the polls ... so I'll just stay home."

You've got to make sure that doesn't happen.

Print this item

  Scientists Against Lockdowns
Posted by: Doug1943 - 10-20-2020, 04:24 PM - Forum: Politics - No Replies

Here's a very interesting article, from the British conservative weekly, The Spectator.

Toby Young
Why can’t we talk about the Great Barrington Declaration?
From magazine issue: 17 October 2020
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/why-...eclaration ]

You probably haven’t heard of the Great Barrington Declaration. This is a petition started by three scientists on 4 October calling for governments to adopt a policy of ‘focused protection’ when it comes to Covid-19. They believe those most at risk should be offered protection — although it shouldn’t be mandatory — and those not at risk, which is pretty much everyone under 65 without an underlying health condition, should be encouraged to return to normal. In this way, the majority will get infected and then recover, gradually building up herd immunity, and that in turn will mean the elderly and the vulnerable no longer have to hide themselves away. According to these experts, this is the tried and tested way of managing the risk posed by a new infectious disease, dating back thousands of years.

The three scientists who created it aren’t outliers or cranks, but professors at Oxford, Harvard and Stanford. And since its launch, the declaration been signed by tens of thousands of epidemiologists and public health scientists, including a Nobel Prize winner. So why haven’t you heard of it? The short answer is there’s been a well-orchestrated attempt to suppress and discredit it. I searched for it on Google last Saturday and the top link was to an article in an obscure left-wing magazine claiming the petition was the work of a ‘climate science denial network’ funded by a right-wing billionaire. The top video link was to a Channel 4 News report in which Devi Sridhar, a public health advisor to the Scottish government, denounced the declaration as not ‘scientific’. A bit rich considering Devi’s PhD is in social anthropology, whereas Sunetra Gupta, one of the petition’s authors, is a global expert on infectious diseases. In the first ten pages of Google search results, not one took me to the actual declaration.

It is hard to find any mention of it on Reddit, the world’s best-known discussion website. The two most popular subreddits devoted to the virus — r/COVID19 and r/Coronavirus — have excised all references to it, with the moderators of the latter denouncing it as ‘spam’. A similar line has been taken by nearly all left-leaning newspapers. The Guardian ran an article on the declaration last Saturday, but only to flag up that its more than 400,000 signatories included a handful of dubious-sounding ‘experts’, such as ‘Dr Johnny Bananas’ and ‘Prof Cominic Dummings’. Hardly surprising, given that lockdown zealots have been openly encouraging their followers on social media to sign up with fake names.

But it gets worse. On Monday, Professor Gupta appeared on BBC News to talk about the new lockdown measures in the north of England. Just before she went on air, one of the producers told her not to mention the declaration. Naturally, she ignored this instruction, but where did it come from? At the end of last month, Professor Susan Michie, a member of Sage, took to Twitter to complain that she’d been invited on to the Today programme to discuss focused protection on the understanding that the scientists behind it would be portrayed as beyond the pale, only for Professor Gupta to make a compelling, logical argument. ‘I’d got prior agreement from R4 about the framing of the item,’ she wrote. ‘I was assured that this would not be held as an even-handed debate.’ On whose authority had she been given that assurance?

I suspect Ofcom’s ‘coronavirus guidance’ has something to do with it. This guidance, published when the lockdown was announced in March, warns broadcasters to exercise extreme caution before criticising the response by the public health authorities or interviewing any sceptics. The organisation I set up last February, the Free Speech Union, is currently trying to judicially review this guidance, but in the interim the BBC no longer needs to suppress discussion of the declaration because the WHO, the most respectable public health authority in the world, has done a U-turn on lockdowns. This was made clear on Spectator TV last week by Professor David Nabarro, one of six coronavirus envoys appointed by the WHO’s director-general. ‘We in the World Health Organisation do not advocate lockdowns as the primary means of control of this virus,’ he told Andrew Neil, before going on to highlight the collateral damage they’ve caused across the world, echoing the words of the declaration.

Ignore the censors and the smear merchants. Go to gbdeclaration.org right now and sign the petition.

Print this item

  Democrats Kneel to ....?
Posted by: Doug1943 - 10-17-2020, 09:15 PM - Forum: Politics - No Replies

About Kneeling..    From John McNulty...
John McNulty (born May 29, 1968), is an American football coach who is currently the tight ends coach at the University of Notre Dame. He is a former player and graduate of the Penn State University. McNulty returned to Rutgers, where he spent five seasons as an assistant coach and offensive coordinator from 2004 to 2008. The veteran coach also spent 15 seasons in the National Football League (NFL), coaching for six different teams.
He said:  “I watched the Democratic leaders of Congress kneel in the halls of Congress for about 9 minutes, for the death of a black man named George Floyd. 
I have never seen them kneel for a fallen Police Officer.
I have never seen them kneel for a fallen Soldier.
I have never seen them kneel for the thousands of (black and white) babies aborted EVERY DAY.
I have never seen them kneel for a murdered white man or woman.
I have not seen them kneel for the thousands of black-on-black murder victims.
I have not seen them kneel for the thousands of elderly people that died in nursing homes due to the Corona Virus. (Especially N.Y.)
I have to ask:  WHY are Democrats putting the life of George Floyd as more valuable than the lives of everyone else?
In fact, Democrats have put so much value on the life of George Floyd, they have allowed rioting, looting, arson, ? ?murder, and mayhem in communities nationwide...
The family (brothers and sister) of George Floyd opened a Go Fund Me account to "help the family"?  It has already raised $14,455,100.00 and still counting from donations as of June 22, 2020.  Yes, almost $14 1/2 MILLION.  This is for  a guy who was arrested NINE times; was a convicted drug dealer (and at a drug deal the day he died); held a gun to the stomach of a pregnant lady while his five buddies robbed her home; did prison time three different times totaling about eight years, and obviously didn't learn from our penal system. And America is memorializing him by painting murals of the guy on the sides of buildings like he's a hero? Unbelievable!!
You've got to be kidding me.
Crime does pay! .....and to pour salt in the wound, Rep. Pelosi (democrat) presented his brother a folded American flag flown over the Capitol in his honor in a beautiful tri-cornered presentation case.
John McNulty

Print this item

  World Health Organization Wrecks the Democrats' Narrative on COVID-19 Lockdowns
Posted by: Sunsettommy - 10-13-2020, 03:05 AM - Forum: Politics - No Replies

Leftist stupidity in full view, the lockdown idea was always doomed to failure.

Pj Media

World Health Organization Wrecks the Democrats' Narrative on COVID-19 Lockdowns



Perhaps the World Health Organization (WHO) can help settle the insane political argument over lockdowns in the United States. Lockdowns have become highly partisan rather than something based on data and information. The world has seven months of experience with COVID-19 now, and a few facts have become more than clear.

According to the CDC’s Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) calculations, COVID-19 is rarely fatal to those under 19. In fact, IFR for those under 50 is lower than that of the seasonal flu. These calculations were made based on early data from Europe, and treatment has improved. Additionally, U.S. hospitals have never been overwhelmed, nor has any American ever been denied treatment.

At the beginning of the outbreak, this strain on resources was a primary concern. Since then, we have increased the supply of ventilators, personal protective equipment, and other needed supplies. The health system has demonstrated the ability to surge resources where they are needed quickly. Several therapeutics are also helping people survive and recover more quickly.

In light of this, the World Health Organization has a message for world leaders: Stop using lockdowns as a primary control for the pandemic. Like President Trump, they note the health and economic costs of lockdowns, especially in a global economy:


Print this item

  Man Who Believes He's On The Right Side Of History Announces Crackdown On The Jews
Posted by: PeteS in CA - 10-08-2020, 05:51 PM - Forum: Politics - Replies (2)

Man Who Believes He's On The Right Side Of History Announces Crackdown On The Jews


Quote:ALBANY, NY—Governor Andrew Cuomo believes he is on the right side of history. He also just announced a plan to target and crack down on Jewish activity in his state.

"We're on the right side of history," said the man who announced a crackdown on Jewish synagogues. "Nothing bad has ever come from targeting Jews. They're Jews, for goodness' sake. If they didn't want to get harassed, they shouldn't have become Jews."

Maybe I'm splitting a hair, but this seems more like hyperbole than satire.

Print this item

  Hall of Shame
Posted by: Sunsettommy - 10-08-2020, 12:50 AM - Forum: Announcements - No Replies


Donnason for two pages of spamming advertising.

Print this item

  Christopher Wray and FBI Under Fire for Excessive Redactions and Slow-Walking Release
Posted by: Sunsettommy - 10-07-2020, 03:04 PM - Forum: Politics - No Replies

Pj Media

Christopher Wray and FBI Under Fire for Excessive Redactions and Slow-Walking Release of Declassified Docs



FBI Director Christopher Wray is having a bad day. He’s trending on Twitter with rumors swirling that he’s going to resign or be fired sometime later today. He’s scheduled to have a press conference at 11:00 a.m. ET regarding a matter of “national security.” But until then, we can only guess what some of the fuss is about.

My money is on the criticism he’s getting for releasing documents to senators that are unreadable due to excessive redactions. Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.) went after him during an interview with ‘Sunday Morning Futures’ host Maria Bartiromo. “They’re on their second extension… I am not happy at all with Director Wray and the FBI,” said Johnson. “His job should be to restore the integrity and credibility of the FBI and the only way to do that is by exposure.”

Watch Johnson accuse Wray of hiding embarrassing facts from the public to protect the FBI’s reputation by showing the documents the Bureau produced that are completely covered by redactions.



They are hiding something

Print this item

  Covid-19: The Fauci Fiasco
Posted by: Sunsettommy - 10-01-2020, 04:10 PM - Forum: Science and Environment - Replies (3)

C3 Headlines

Covid-19: The Fauci Fiasco

August 29, 2020


One has to wonder if Anthony Fauci et al should be considered as enemies of the state?

Fauci's Covid flip-flopping and constantly being wrong since January has become a national disgrace. And the leaders of the CDC, NIH and FDA are sitting in that same Fauci boat named 'Fiasco,' still pulling the oars in the opposite direction of what's best overall for Americans. 
Below are a sample of recent Tweets that confirms the obvious: American infectious disease experts are an embarrassment, if not a world laughingstock.
[Image: 6a010536b58035970c026be40cc893200d-800wi]
[Image: 6a010536b58035970c026be40cc8a2200d-750wi]

Link to a lot more


Down in the link are charts worth seeing, showing that face masks failures are obvious.

Print this item

  DNI John Ratcliffe Presents Senate With Brennan Notes Showcasing Clinton Campaign Int
Posted by: Sunsettommy - 09-29-2020, 10:45 PM - Forum: In the news - Replies (2)

The Last Refuge

DNI John Ratcliffe Presents Senate With Brennan Notes Showcasing Clinton Campaign Intent to Create Russian Conspiracy Narrative July 2016…

Posted on September 29, 2020 by sundance


Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe has transmitted evidence to the Senate Judiciary Committee showing notes written by CIA Director John Brennan that Hillary Clinton campaign advisors created a “proposal to vilify Trump by stirring up scandal claiming interference by Russian security services” on July 26th of 2016. [pdf link]


Print this item

  Anti-Prosperity Democrats Joe Biden & Kamala Harris Are Wrong: Climate Change & Globa
Posted by: Sunsettommy - 09-29-2020, 12:46 PM - Forum: Science and Environment - No Replies

C3 Headlines

Anti-Prosperity Democrats Joe Biden & Kamala Harris Are Wrong: Climate Change & Global Warming Are Natural, Not A Result of CO2

August 11, 2020


[Image: 6a010536b58035970c026bde89b172200c-pi]

Out of touch, and well outside the boundaries of the U.S. mainstream moderate electorate, Democrat Joe Biden and his fringe left colleagues have been declaring that the world - as we know it - is soon going to end due to a global warming and a resulting climate change apocalypse.

But is that a reasonable, rational pro-science expectation?

Instead of focusing on the major reason of a natural rebound progression of global warming since the Little Ice Age, the anti-growth, anti-prosperity Democrats point to the smaller human related impact: fossil fuel emissions (CO2) from modern industrial/consumer activities.

The Democrat Party's anti-growth, anti-prosperity, anti-CO2 platform has become a dominant party position ever since the June 1988 climate doomsday Congressional testimony of NASA's chief climate scientist, James Hansen.

It was from that Congressional testimony that the doomsday prophecies of unprecedented global temperature change from CO2 became the lodestone of the party's faithful.

So, how good have those doomsday global warming change prophecies been since June 1988 (32 years ago)? In a one-word summation: lousy.


Print this item